Guidelines

Author Guidelines

Due to the high volume of submissions, we adhere to specific regulations regarding the length, level, and format of submissions. To avoid delays and potential rejections, authors are encouraged to follow our submission format.

Article Types

The journal accepts the following types of manuscripts:

Proofs

Before submitting your manuscript, please read the following guidelines to ensure your submission is in the correct format. Failure to comply may result in delays or rejection.

Proofs

Before submitting your manuscript, please read the following guidelines to ensure your submission is in the correct format. Failure to comply may result in delays or rejection.

Manuscript Structure

The manuscript should include the following sections:

• Cover Letter
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Materials and Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusions
• Acknowledgements
• References

Cover Letter

The cover letter should be the first page and must include:

• Article title
• Authors
• Affiliations
• Corresponding author’s contact information

Main Body Content

• File Format: Editable Microsoft Word format (.doc/.docx).
• Figures, Tables, Media: Submit separately in editable formats.
• Formatting:
• Title: Times New Roman, 15 pt, Bold, Title Case, Centered
• Author(s): Times New Roman, 11 pt, Bold, Left-aligned
• Affiliations: Times New Roman, 10 pt, Normal, Justified
• Corresponding author: Times New Roman, 10 pt, Normal, Justified
• Headings: Times New Roman, 11 pt, Bold, Left-Right Aligned
• Subheadings: Times New Roman, 10 pt, Bold, Left-Right Aligned
• Spacing: 1.5 line spacing, no indentation before or after paragraphs

Manuscript Title

Titles should be brief, precise, and free of acronyms, abbreviations, or punctuation. They should reflect the manuscript content.

Authors and Affiliations

List authors by last name followed by initials, without punctuation. Use superscript numbers for affiliations, and asterisk (*) for the corresponding author.

Example: Samual JP¹* and Andrwes RS²

Affiliations Example:
¹Department of Oncology, Janoahia Medical Center, Nevada, USA.
²Department of Neuro-Oncology, Janoahia Medical Center, Nevada, USA.

Corresponding Author

Include full details:

Samual JP, Department of Oncology, Janoahia Medical Center, Nevada, USA.
Tel: 715-852-7852; Fax: 628-789-7368; Email: samuel@Janoahia.edu

Abstract

Maximum 300 words summarizing the article without citing references.

Keywords

Provide 4-6 keywords accurately representing the subject matter.

Abbreviations

List all abbreviations used in the manuscript, separated by semicolons.

Materials and Methods

Provide clear details of materials, methods, and protocols to allow replication by other researchers.

Results and Discussion

Clearly present results followed by an interpretation. Support findings with relevant figures and tables.

Proofs

Upon final approval, proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for review within 24 hours. Only essential corrections can be made at this stage.

References

Use Vancouver style. Cite references in the order they appear in the text using square brackets.

Examples:

• Wilfond BS, Farrell PM, Laxova A, Mischler E. Severe hemolytic anemia associated with vitamin E deficiency in infants with cystic fibrosis. Clin Pediatr. 1994; 33: 2–7.
• Sokol RJ, Reardon MC, Accurso FJ, et al. Fat-soluble-vitamin status during the first year of life in infants with cystic fibrosis identified by screening of newborns. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989; 50: 1064–71.

Figures

Submit JPEG format, 600 x 1200 pixels (high resolution), one figure per page with title and concise legend.

Tables

Submit in Microsoft Word. Avoid images. Tables should be one page, consistent in font, and with footnotes explaining abbreviations or symbols.

Acknowledgements

List contributors who don't meet authorship criteria. Obtain permission before including individuals.

Copyrights

All content published is copyrighted by the Journal of Clinical and Medical Case Reports in Cancer and requires written consent for reproduction or transmission.

Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and quality of published research. The following guidelines are intended to help reviewers fulfill their responsibilities effectively and professionally.

Scope and Suitability

Upon receiving a manuscript, reviewers should assess whether the content aligns with their area of expertise. If the subject matter is outside their scope, they should promptly inform the editorial team.

Plagiarism and Originality

Reviewers must ensure that the manuscript is original, free from plagiarism, and not previously published elsewhere. They should verify that the study’s findings are novel and relevant to the journal's scope.

Timeliness

Reviews must be completed within the timeframe specified by the editorial team. If a delay is anticipated, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor so alternative arrangements can be made.

Confidentiality

All materials submitted for review are confidential. Reviewers must not share, distribute, or discuss the manuscript or its content with anyone outside the editorial process.

Constructive Feedback

Reviewer comments should be:

• Clear, concise, and well-structured.
• Balanced—highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.
• Objective and focused on the content, not the author(s).
• Free from offensive, biased, or discriminatory language.
• Helpful to both the authors and the editors in improving the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

If a reviewer identifies any potential conflict of interest—personal, professional, or financial—related to the manuscript, they must disclose this to the editor before proceeding with the review.

By adhering to these principles, reviewers help uphold the journal’s standards and contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.

Editor Guidelines

Editors play a vital role in ensuring the integrity, quality, and timely dissemination of scholarly content. Their primary responsibility is to manage the peer-review process in accordance with the journal’s editorial policies and ethical standards.

1. General Responsibilities

• Oversee the peer-review process to maintain the quality and academic rigor of all submissions.
• Ensure all editorial practices align with the publisher’s policies and international open-access standards.
• Maintain strict confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts, reviewer identities, and editorial decisions.
• Respond promptly to communications from the Editorial Office and adhere to review timelines.
• Evaluate submissions objectively, without bias, and provide transparent, well-justified decisions.
• Treat all authors and reviewers with professionalism, dignity, and impartiality.
• Avoid handling manuscripts where any conflict of interest exists and promptly notify the Editorial Office if such conflicts arise.
• Offer constructive guidance to authors regarding manuscript improvement, where appropriate.

2. Role of the Editor-in-Chief

• Provide leadership to the editorial board and uphold the journal’s academic and ethical standards.
• Guide the development of journal policies in line with global open-access norms.
• Monitor and ensure the quality of the peer-review process for all submitted manuscripts.
• Encourage editorial board members to contribute to inaugural and special issues.
• Hold final authority in all decisions related to manuscript acceptance and publication.

3. Responsibilities of Editorial Board Members

• Participate actively in journal development and contribute regular, informed suggestions to improve journal quality.
• Accept manuscript assignments promptly, based on subject matter expertise, following a plagiarism check.
• If unable to accept an assignment, notify the Editorial Office as soon as possible with a valid explanation.
• Ensure the fair and unbiased assessment of all submissions, guided by honesty and transparency.
• Provide timely and clear final decisions on assigned manuscripts, including reasons for acceptance or rejection.
• Help manage requests related to editorial reconsiderations or feedback on peer-review reports.
• Communicate effectively with the Editorial Office at all stages of the review and publication process.

4. Managing the Peer-Review Process

• Select appropriate, subject-qualified reviewers for assigned manuscripts.
• Ensure reviewers do not misuse or disclose any part of the manuscript they are reviewing.
• Clearly convey review expectations, including timelines and quality standards, to the reviewers.
• Allow reviewers adequate time for thorough evaluation while ensuring deadlines are met.
• Monitor reviewer performance and intervene if timelines or quality standards are not met.

5. Special Issues and Strategic Initiatives

• Evaluate proposals for special issues based on their relevance to the journal’s scope, importance of the topic, and timeline feasibility.
• Recommend contemporary and significant themes for future issues and propose potential guest editors.
• Collaborate with the Editorial Office on key decisions, such as reviewing published volumes or resolving procedural concerns.
• Act as a guide for shaping the journal’s direction by identifying timely topics and potential contributing authors.
• Provide creative and strategic feedback to help align journal content with reader interests.

6. Compliance and Conduct

• Abide by all editorial policies and protocols issued by the Editorial Office.
• Uphold the journal’s reputation by promoting ethical, fair, and transparent editorial practices.

By adhering to these guidelines, editors help maintain the journal’s academic standards and contribute to the dissemination of credible and impactful research.